Showing posts with label romance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label romance. Show all posts

Friday, November 14, 2008

North & South :: Exceeds Expectations


North and South
[BBC, 2004]

Starring:
Richard Armitage
Daniela Denby-Ashe
Sinead Cusack
Others That Were Lovely Too

entertainment rating:
~
performance:
screenplay:
plot/storyline: ★
cinematography: ★
~
BBC Drama

******SPOILER ALERT******
(There are spoilers in this review! After the three paragraphs, spoilers will pop up! It's a kind of predictable story, so you probably shouldn't worry about it, but, just so you know...)

I'm back! And better than ever! With a terrifically long post! It's been a long time since I posted a review, but then again, it's been a long time since I've watched anything worth noting. After we finished the Eliott series, we were unsure of what to do next - the libraries seemed out of things to reserve, there was nothing we wanted to rent... There were a few things we did watch: there was the shallow but cute Nim's Island; Get Smart, which "missed it by that much;" the kind of depressing Evening; and the delightfully colorful Pushing Daisies; the hilarious and charming Miss Pettigrew Lives For a Day. And, of course, let's not forget Star Trek, the Next Generation, Season One.

And after all of this modern or futuristic film (c'mon, you know Star Trek is futuristic! Do you have a holodeck?), we were starting to hurt from 17th Century England withdraw. "Ouch!" we said, as Riker gets out his phaser and blasts a alien enemy. "Nooo," we say, "he's not attractive unless you put him in a tailcoat and cravat! Or even better, no cravat!" Tell-tale signs of BBC withdraw. And so you can imagine how excited we were to find that we could replace Star Trek (though it has its time and place) for a gorgeous and relatively new BBC drama. And not only was it just any drama, but it was adapted from an Elizabeth Gaskell book. Gaskell wrote Cranford, as well, which was adapted by BBC last year. A very good series.

Here is the brief version of my review, which contains NO spoilers. :)

North and South at first seems to be very much like other period dramas. The story told through the eyes of Margaret Hale (Denby-Ashe) and John Thornton (Armitage). Margaret is a strong young woman who, until the start of the story, lived in the comfortable, green South. (I capitalize the compass points for drama!) Her father uproots Margaret and her mother to move to the cold and dirty North, to a town called Milton, where the cotton industry and poverty rule the streets. John Thornton is the master of a prominent cotton mill - formidable, intelligent, to-drool-over without his cravat on... Moving on. The story revolves around how Margaret conforms to the ways of the North, how she adapts and learns to understand the people who live there - including the apparently unscrupulous Mr. Thornton.

We loved it. It is becoming our next Jane Eyre.

That is my brief version. :) I don't blame you if you chose to read the itsy-bitsy version and leave the rest and go about your daily life. But you see, I have *so* many thoughts on the movie that I simply had to continue writing about it, so my more in depth and spoiler-filled thoughts are as follows...

North and South seems, at first, to be like other period dramas. It is a perfect mix of a Jane Austen-like story, in the world of a Charles Dickens tale. Who could ask for more?!

Upon settling in Milton, Margaret's first acquaintances are the Thorntons, who own the most prominent cotton mill in Milton, Marborough Mill. And here is where you meet the leading man - Mr. John Thornton, Master of Marborough Mill. I loved how he was introduced: First viewed by Margaret, standing over his workrooms, and then, in a flying rage, beating a worker for smoking on the job. You immediately dislike him (despite his dreamy British qualities) - and so does Margaret. It fits! Finally, the prejudiced young woman *and* the audience doesn't like him much! I mean, who really didn't like Mr. Darcy, despite his incivility? Incivility doesn't affect an audience, nay, the more incivility the better, but to beat a helpless worker? To shout at her, telling her to get lost?

The characters in this story are very 3-dimensional. Mr. Thornton starts out seeming harsh, and slowly, through all four hours of the show, you see his depths. He isn't so bad, not at all. He is a self-made man, a sensible, clever man, who, despite his hard outward appearance necessary for his trade, is sensitive as well. His mother, Mrs. Hannah Thornton (Cusack), developed very much like her son - you begin by thinking she is an annoying, uppity, harsh woman, but as time goes on you see that she loves her son to death and her pride for him is explained. Some of the best scenes in the entire movie are between John and his mother. John's father died when he was young, so John and his mother have a close relationship - while his sister Fanny, who gave an absolutely hilarious performance - is just tolerated.

Margaret and her family are interesting, as well, though her parents aren't the most lively of people. Her mother is ill and her father is slightly simple, but neither are stupid. Margaret acts as the head of the family, independent and confident, though conforming to the ways of the North was a hard process. She befriends the workers, and as time goes on, she becomes familiar with the North, calls it her home as warmly as she before called the South so.

Margaret and John's relationship is hilter-kilter throughout. They begin on very bad terms, what with Margaret's deep loathing of him. They end up arguing at every meeting and generally make a mess of every conversation. However, Margaret is different than a stereotypical prejudiced young lady. She learns, she doesn't hold onto her grudges. Her opinions change, and though she once thought John was a harsh, horrible man, she adapts as she finds the reasoning to his methods.

All in all, it was a very enjoyable performance. The actors were great - Richard Armitage, whom we had never seen in anything before this, was really good (and so pale, my heavens.) His character had equal portions of acting with intensity, and with subtlety. Not many actors are equally good at both, but Richard aced it. Daniela Denby-Ashe was also a newbie for us, however, we liked her immensely. I love her eyebrows! She was really, really great at subtle acting, just the slightest change to her facial expression conveyed exactly what she was thinking about. And Sinead Cusack? Wow, she was fantastic, really awesome character portrayal and that accent...

We were also really impressed by how pretty the movie was - the colors and feel of all of the settings and clothes really reflected the story and setting. Very pretty colors; muted and dingy in the North, colorful and vibrant in the South.

I want to watch it again, already! We've watched it twice so far, but I have a feeling it's going to be viewed many more a time.


P.S. I promise that do so *not* have a thing for period drama guys with open shirt necks! What an accusation... Cross my fingers - I mean - heart!


Thursday, March 6, 2008

Never Been Kissed
[1999]

Starring:
Drew Barrymore
Micheal Vartan
David Arquette
Jessica Alba
Leelee Sobieski
Molly Shannon

average rating:
~
performance:
screenplay: ★
plot/storyline: ★
cinematography: ★
~
Romantic Comedy

Why did this so loved movie get two stars from us? Perhaps it is the fact that Drew Barrymore has a seriously deformed face that Mother and I find hard to admire, yes, even to look at. Perhaps it is the fact that Micheal Vartan's hair curled much too far down the back of his neck. Perhaps it is the fact that John C. Reilly looks like pig. But I think I will set all of these vain, shallow reasons aside to allow for something more interesting, something more substantial. After all, there are many a movie in which we ignore deformities and haircuts, Jane Eyre (2006) for instance.

No, it was something else that spurred me to take the remote and speed through half the movie. I think that something was because the movie was, um, boring. Predictable. Same old. Simpering. Lame. Generally what defines a O.M.G. movie.

Runaway Bride
[1999]

Starring:
Julia Roberts
Richard Gere
Joan Cusack

average rating:
~
performance:
screenplay: ★
plot/storyline: ★
cinematography: ★
~
Romantic Comedy


So. I'm not even going to elaborate much on this movie. It was from 1999, so what can we really expect, but it was terrible anyway.

Monday, January 21, 2008

Northanger Abbey
[Masterpiece Theatre, 2007]

Starring:
Felicity Jones
JJ Fields
Carey Mulligan

average rating: ★
~
performance: ★
screenplay: ★
plot/storyline: ★
cinematography: ★
~
Jane Austen

Friday, January 18, 2008

Persuasion
[2007]

Starring:
Sally Hawkins
Rupert Penry-Jones

average rating: ★★★
~
performance: ★★
screenplay: ★★
plot/storyline: ★★
cinematography: ★★
~
19th Century England/Romance/Society

Exciting news! Masterpiece Theater is hosting a new 2008 Classic Series this winter beginning with the Complete Jane Austen. The lineup of Austen adaptations include: Persuasion, Northanger Abbey, Mansfield Park, Miss Austen Regrets, Pride and Prejudice, Emma and Sense and Sensibility.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/masterpiece/austen/index.html

Masterpiece Theater has also updated a few of the Jane Austen adaptations: Persuasion, Northanger Abbey, Mansfield Park, and a new film called, Miss Austen Regrets.
The first presentation in the Complete Jane Austen was Persuasion, Sunday, January 13, starring Sally Hawkins and Rupert Penry-Jones. This Austen story is about love and social classes, as are most of her novels. Below is the film's summary from MT's website:

Unhappily unmarried at age 27, and dealing with family financial peril, hope is fading from Anne Elliot's (Sally Hawkins, Little Britain) life. Circumstances bring Captain Frederick Wentworth (Rupert Penry-Jones, Casanova), a dashing naval officer she once deeply loved, back into her life eight years after Anne was persuaded by her family to reject his marriage proposal. Having returned from sea with a new fortune, Wentworth is surrounded by swooning women while Anne broods at the periphery, longing to be in Wentworth's favor. Now Anne comes face-to-face with the deep regret of her old decision, and her abiding love for Wentworth, as she wonders if a long ago love can be rekindled.

Sally Hawkins' performance as Anne Elliot was very good, and she did a fine job portraying Anne's situation; nearly too old for any marriage considerations, heartbroken from her long-ago love, and worried for her family's change in financial and social standing.

Rupert is a pleasant improvement as the British love-interest in this new adaptation. His portrayal of Captain Frederick Wentworth is good, although a little sparse, but his scenes seem to be enough to pull off the story's plot.
My only negative comment regarding this film, would be the fact that it's just too short. They crammed an entire Austen novel into 1 1/2 hours film time. Even the 1995 adaptation was longer, more detailed, and presented a more complete story line.

As Austen fans, Caroline and I are delighted to see Masterpiece Theater continue to update these excellent classics. (we LOVE last year's new Jane Eyre)

Thursday, January 17, 2008

Charade
[1963]

Starring:
Audrey Hepburn
Cary Grant
Walter Mattau

average rating: ★★★
~
performance: ★★
screenplay: ★★
plot/storyline: ★★
cinematography: ★★
~
Murder Mystery / Romance

Charade is a very silly movie, actually, though I'm sure that back in the 60's it was considered scary. When we first watched it, however, I do remember thinking that it had a good plot for the era, one that was genuinely unpredictable.

The story centers around a young woman named Regina Lambert (Hepburn) who's husband recently died, leaving her with three thugs on her tail, chasing her for a quarter of a million dollars that they think she simply must have. At first she seems to have a man named Peter Joshua (Grant) on her side, a man whom she falls in love with. But is he really Peter Joshua, and who's side is he really on? Meanwhile, a man from the American Embassy, Mr. Bartholomew (Mattau) claims that this quarter of a million dollars belongs to the government, though he is someone who seems to really be on her side.

Performances of Audrey and Cary are the same as they are in any of their other movies, but just as endearing. One of the best parts of the movie is when Cary Grant, after being coaxed to take a shower in Audrey's room, stubbornly and hilariously takes a shower in his full suit, claiming that it was a "drip-dry" suit and that the manufacturers recommended it to keep the suit in shape.

The movie is quick-paced and funny - definitely worth the watch.

[poster courtesy of moviegoods.com]
The Sound of Music
[Rogers & Hammerstein, 1965]

Starring:
Julie Andrews
Christopher Plummer

average rating: ★
~
performance:
screenplay: ★
plot/storyline: ★
cinematography: ★★
~
Musical... hence Julie Andrews being in it...

Saturday, January 5, 2008

Jane Eyre

[Masterpiece Theatre, 2006]

Starring:
Ruth Wilson
Toby Stephens
Christina Cole
Andrew Buchan
Lorraine Ashbourne

average rating: ★★★
~
performance: ★★
screenplay: ★★
plot/storyline: ★★★
cinematography: ★★
~
19th Century England/Gothic Novel Romance

As you might have noticed on our lists, this new version of Charlotte Brontë's classic is one of our all-time favorite movies. We caught it on TV when it first came out last year, in two parts. At the time we watched the first part, I had never read the book, nor was remotely interested in Brontë or Austen. However, I watched the first part on our bad receptionist of a TV and fell in love with it, so, in a mad sort of frenzy, found the book at the library and downed it before the next part of the movie aired the next week.

Ruth Wilson, who had acted in nothing before this movie, plays a brilliant Jane. She has very odd looks, but however shocking her face is to begin with, she grows on you almost immediately. She fits the Jane description well, I thought. Toby Stephens, who plays Rochester, fits Rochester's description to perfection, too. Dark hair, high forehead, not the best of looks, just the right age, just the right attitude. The two are perfect on screen together. As for the other actors, the Mrs. Fairfax is brilliant, as are Blanche Ingram, St. John Rivers and the others.

The screenplay is controversial, because it is definitely lacking many conversations between Rochester and Jane, among other things, but for the size of the book and the length of the movie, it is quite sufficient. The plot is intact and flows well, which is sometimes all that matters.

The story is of a girl named Jane Eyre whose parents died when she was very young, leaving her to an indifferent aunt and uncle. When her uncle dies, Jane is sent to an orphanage, where she spends eight terrible years. After advertising for a job as governess, she is accepted to be governess to a little French girl under the guardianship of a Mr. Rochester. Mr. Rochester is a mysterious, sardonic man with too much money and some sort of secret. Jane falls in love with him, but there is a catch... But you must watch it for yourself. :)

Though this film is definitely not as pretty as Pride and Prejudice (2005), but then the story is entirely different, and the way it was filmed reflects the mood very well. There are odd camera angles and lighting, and quite a few hand-held moments, but in general, the unconventional techniques grow on you as much as Ruth and Toby.