Showing posts with label BBC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BBC. Show all posts

Friday, November 14, 2008

North & South :: Exceeds Expectations


North and South
[BBC, 2004]

Starring:
Richard Armitage
Daniela Denby-Ashe
Sinead Cusack
Others That Were Lovely Too

entertainment rating:
~
performance:
screenplay:
plot/storyline: ★
cinematography: ★
~
BBC Drama

******SPOILER ALERT******
(There are spoilers in this review! After the three paragraphs, spoilers will pop up! It's a kind of predictable story, so you probably shouldn't worry about it, but, just so you know...)

I'm back! And better than ever! With a terrifically long post! It's been a long time since I posted a review, but then again, it's been a long time since I've watched anything worth noting. After we finished the Eliott series, we were unsure of what to do next - the libraries seemed out of things to reserve, there was nothing we wanted to rent... There were a few things we did watch: there was the shallow but cute Nim's Island; Get Smart, which "missed it by that much;" the kind of depressing Evening; and the delightfully colorful Pushing Daisies; the hilarious and charming Miss Pettigrew Lives For a Day. And, of course, let's not forget Star Trek, the Next Generation, Season One.

And after all of this modern or futuristic film (c'mon, you know Star Trek is futuristic! Do you have a holodeck?), we were starting to hurt from 17th Century England withdraw. "Ouch!" we said, as Riker gets out his phaser and blasts a alien enemy. "Nooo," we say, "he's not attractive unless you put him in a tailcoat and cravat! Or even better, no cravat!" Tell-tale signs of BBC withdraw. And so you can imagine how excited we were to find that we could replace Star Trek (though it has its time and place) for a gorgeous and relatively new BBC drama. And not only was it just any drama, but it was adapted from an Elizabeth Gaskell book. Gaskell wrote Cranford, as well, which was adapted by BBC last year. A very good series.

Here is the brief version of my review, which contains NO spoilers. :)

North and South at first seems to be very much like other period dramas. The story told through the eyes of Margaret Hale (Denby-Ashe) and John Thornton (Armitage). Margaret is a strong young woman who, until the start of the story, lived in the comfortable, green South. (I capitalize the compass points for drama!) Her father uproots Margaret and her mother to move to the cold and dirty North, to a town called Milton, where the cotton industry and poverty rule the streets. John Thornton is the master of a prominent cotton mill - formidable, intelligent, to-drool-over without his cravat on... Moving on. The story revolves around how Margaret conforms to the ways of the North, how she adapts and learns to understand the people who live there - including the apparently unscrupulous Mr. Thornton.

We loved it. It is becoming our next Jane Eyre.

That is my brief version. :) I don't blame you if you chose to read the itsy-bitsy version and leave the rest and go about your daily life. But you see, I have *so* many thoughts on the movie that I simply had to continue writing about it, so my more in depth and spoiler-filled thoughts are as follows...

North and South seems, at first, to be like other period dramas. It is a perfect mix of a Jane Austen-like story, in the world of a Charles Dickens tale. Who could ask for more?!

Upon settling in Milton, Margaret's first acquaintances are the Thorntons, who own the most prominent cotton mill in Milton, Marborough Mill. And here is where you meet the leading man - Mr. John Thornton, Master of Marborough Mill. I loved how he was introduced: First viewed by Margaret, standing over his workrooms, and then, in a flying rage, beating a worker for smoking on the job. You immediately dislike him (despite his dreamy British qualities) - and so does Margaret. It fits! Finally, the prejudiced young woman *and* the audience doesn't like him much! I mean, who really didn't like Mr. Darcy, despite his incivility? Incivility doesn't affect an audience, nay, the more incivility the better, but to beat a helpless worker? To shout at her, telling her to get lost?

The characters in this story are very 3-dimensional. Mr. Thornton starts out seeming harsh, and slowly, through all four hours of the show, you see his depths. He isn't so bad, not at all. He is a self-made man, a sensible, clever man, who, despite his hard outward appearance necessary for his trade, is sensitive as well. His mother, Mrs. Hannah Thornton (Cusack), developed very much like her son - you begin by thinking she is an annoying, uppity, harsh woman, but as time goes on you see that she loves her son to death and her pride for him is explained. Some of the best scenes in the entire movie are between John and his mother. John's father died when he was young, so John and his mother have a close relationship - while his sister Fanny, who gave an absolutely hilarious performance - is just tolerated.

Margaret and her family are interesting, as well, though her parents aren't the most lively of people. Her mother is ill and her father is slightly simple, but neither are stupid. Margaret acts as the head of the family, independent and confident, though conforming to the ways of the North was a hard process. She befriends the workers, and as time goes on, she becomes familiar with the North, calls it her home as warmly as she before called the South so.

Margaret and John's relationship is hilter-kilter throughout. They begin on very bad terms, what with Margaret's deep loathing of him. They end up arguing at every meeting and generally make a mess of every conversation. However, Margaret is different than a stereotypical prejudiced young lady. She learns, she doesn't hold onto her grudges. Her opinions change, and though she once thought John was a harsh, horrible man, she adapts as she finds the reasoning to his methods.

All in all, it was a very enjoyable performance. The actors were great - Richard Armitage, whom we had never seen in anything before this, was really good (and so pale, my heavens.) His character had equal portions of acting with intensity, and with subtlety. Not many actors are equally good at both, but Richard aced it. Daniela Denby-Ashe was also a newbie for us, however, we liked her immensely. I love her eyebrows! She was really, really great at subtle acting, just the slightest change to her facial expression conveyed exactly what she was thinking about. And Sinead Cusack? Wow, she was fantastic, really awesome character portrayal and that accent...

We were also really impressed by how pretty the movie was - the colors and feel of all of the settings and clothes really reflected the story and setting. Very pretty colors; muted and dingy in the North, colorful and vibrant in the South.

I want to watch it again, already! We've watched it twice so far, but I have a feeling it's going to be viewed many more a time.


P.S. I promise that do so *not* have a thing for period drama guys with open shirt necks! What an accusation... Cross my fingers - I mean - heart!


Friday, August 29, 2008

successfully entertained me :)



House of Eliott
[BBC, 1991]

Starring:
Louise Lombard
Stella Gonet

average rating:
~
performance:
screenplay:
plot/storyline:
cinematography:
~
20's Fashion, lol

"House of Elliot" is a BBC TV drama made in the early 90's, about two sisters in the early 20's. Right before this, I had been on an "Alias" streak (because "Alias" is awesome, most of the time). The only movie store that owns all the seasons of Alias is a Vision Video in town, and when we made the trip over there and found that one of the discs we wanted was checked out, we had to find something else to occupy our designated, very important movie time.

So we were scouring the shelves (and finding the most entertaining box covers and old shows, but nothing we wanted to spend money on) when we came across a few BBC series. We like BBC, in general, they make such fun dramas, and when we saw "House of Eliott" we were interested, but we passed because it looked rather ancient. We know about ancient - aesthetics dictate that "ancient" when applied to "movies" often produce "awful." It's like 'i before e, except after c': it's true the majority of the time, but once in a while you find something that breaks the rule.

However, not but a few days after that a friend of ours (Sarraahhh) told us she had been watching "House of Eliott" and we about died. How weird is that? So we trollop over to the movie store again and pick up a few discs, though already forewarned that the series was "about practically nothing, but very hooking all the same."

And very true that is. The starring characters of "House of Eliott" are the two strong-minded Eliott sisters; Beatrice (Bea), who is a slightly conservative, nearly-middle-aged spinster; and Evangeline (Evie) who is a creative, beautiful, and innovative young woman. The two sisters, having been used to wealth, comfort, and seclusion, are suddenly left flailing in society when their father dies and leaves them no money and a slowly emerging scandal. While the two sisters (who are very close) struggle to find fair jobs in 1920 London, they stumble upon a few lovable characters and a few not-so-lovable ones. Jack Maddox, a popular photographer, takes Beatrice on as a secretary and becomes a very lovable part of the cast as the charming, sarcastic, supportive and (at first) somewhat questionably respectable best friend.

The acting is really quite splendid for a series that was broadcast by BBC in the early 90's. We've seen plenty of horrifying BBC productions from the early ages (haha), and in comparison, and actually in general, the acting is great. The two sisters are very, very natural together. *applauds*

The plot line is very simple, but at the same time it grabs your attention. The characters face ordinary troubles, yet you are just dying to know how they resolve them. Also, the feel of the 20's is always present, especially since the series evolves until the sisters own their own dressmaking business. The clothes are outrageous (I love them) and they are very consistent with their manner of speaking and the social ladder and the jazz music (which sends Mum into the realms of insanity).

We are only three discs into the first series, so I will post another review for the second season. Still, I would recommend this series to anyone who loves British people, adores simplistic stories, is infatuated with all things British + Simplistic + Slightly-Over-Dramatized....(I do!) Anyway, I can't wait to get on with the story. :)


Monday, January 21, 2008

Northanger Abbey
[Masterpiece Theatre, 2007]

Starring:
Felicity Jones
JJ Fields
Carey Mulligan

average rating: ★
~
performance: ★
screenplay: ★
plot/storyline: ★
cinematography: ★
~
Jane Austen

Friday, January 18, 2008

Persuasion
[2007]

Starring:
Sally Hawkins
Rupert Penry-Jones

average rating: ★★★
~
performance: ★★
screenplay: ★★
plot/storyline: ★★
cinematography: ★★
~
19th Century England/Romance/Society

Exciting news! Masterpiece Theater is hosting a new 2008 Classic Series this winter beginning with the Complete Jane Austen. The lineup of Austen adaptations include: Persuasion, Northanger Abbey, Mansfield Park, Miss Austen Regrets, Pride and Prejudice, Emma and Sense and Sensibility.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/masterpiece/austen/index.html

Masterpiece Theater has also updated a few of the Jane Austen adaptations: Persuasion, Northanger Abbey, Mansfield Park, and a new film called, Miss Austen Regrets.
The first presentation in the Complete Jane Austen was Persuasion, Sunday, January 13, starring Sally Hawkins and Rupert Penry-Jones. This Austen story is about love and social classes, as are most of her novels. Below is the film's summary from MT's website:

Unhappily unmarried at age 27, and dealing with family financial peril, hope is fading from Anne Elliot's (Sally Hawkins, Little Britain) life. Circumstances bring Captain Frederick Wentworth (Rupert Penry-Jones, Casanova), a dashing naval officer she once deeply loved, back into her life eight years after Anne was persuaded by her family to reject his marriage proposal. Having returned from sea with a new fortune, Wentworth is surrounded by swooning women while Anne broods at the periphery, longing to be in Wentworth's favor. Now Anne comes face-to-face with the deep regret of her old decision, and her abiding love for Wentworth, as she wonders if a long ago love can be rekindled.

Sally Hawkins' performance as Anne Elliot was very good, and she did a fine job portraying Anne's situation; nearly too old for any marriage considerations, heartbroken from her long-ago love, and worried for her family's change in financial and social standing.

Rupert is a pleasant improvement as the British love-interest in this new adaptation. His portrayal of Captain Frederick Wentworth is good, although a little sparse, but his scenes seem to be enough to pull off the story's plot.
My only negative comment regarding this film, would be the fact that it's just too short. They crammed an entire Austen novel into 1 1/2 hours film time. Even the 1995 adaptation was longer, more detailed, and presented a more complete story line.

As Austen fans, Caroline and I are delighted to see Masterpiece Theater continue to update these excellent classics. (we LOVE last year's new Jane Eyre)

Sunday, December 30, 2007

The Importance of Being Earnest

[1986, BBC]

average rating: ★★★★★
~
performance: ★★★★★
screenplay: ★★★★★
plot/storyline: ★★★★★
cinematography & direction: ★ (exempted from average because it's 1, BBC, and 2, from '86)
~
comedy


Wow. We laughed until our sides literally hurt when we watched this 1986 vers. The dialogue is amazingly clever and very, very funny. The actors are fantastic, saying every line as if they really thought up each of witty line. The plot is ridiculously funny, a chain-reaction of problematic situations that lead to a satisfying end. Since this was filmed by BBC in '86, the cinematography will be forgiven, for they used very strange camera views at times and was not the best quality. But the screenplay made up for any fault the film might have, definitely.